Philip Wen's //

Intelś upcoming Nehalem platform

So Intel is releasing Nehalem finally.  After reading Tomś article, here are some thoughts.

1.  It is disappointing that Intel has purposely crippled overclocking on the new platform.  This will probably cause the enthusiasts/fan crowd to stick with the older platform in the near term.  Even though the i7 920 is reasonably priced, the platform will still be much more expensive than a Yorkfield based system– especially an overclocked Yorkfield.  Value proposition is not quite there for adoption… yet.

2. Until DDR3 and the X58 platform comes down in price, Intel won´t be pushing too many of these.  I do see the release of Nehalem as a prime opportunity for the volume pushers like Dell and HP to start blowing out Yorkfield based systems at bargain prices however, so those would be my recommended systems to pick up for probably the next 2 – 3 quarters (with coupons, of course).

3. Since power consumption is roughly on par with the current Yorkfield platform, and most benchmarks only show a slight performance improvement (Yes, I consider 25% slight compared to the 60-70% that simple overclocking can provide), replacement of current VM farms based on the i7 architecture will not be economically feasible until probably the next iteration of the Nehalem architecture.  Perhaps with the release with Westmere and Sandy Bridge we will be able to see some affordable Nehalem systems.

4. Prices levels have NOT been sticky enough however, so perhaps another year is all it will take.  Provided AMD can still stay in the game with Shanghai, we may see price levels adjusting quickly yet.  AMD has managed to provide decent competition even with an outdated lineup (albeit burning cash along the way), so hereś to hoping that they will last a bit longer.

What are your thoughts on Nehalem?

Post below, or use the following forum to voice your opinion.

Update:  This review also seems to mirror my opinion.  Great performer, but early adopter tax makes it not worthwhile… yet.

Update 2:  Tom’s released an update article to the initial mentioned above.  It looks as if I may have jumped the guns on the above conclusion.  If boards are able to provide a soft switch for the feature, then then 920 may not be a bad investment after all, even at the initial prices.  I will post an update on this topic after I am able to get my hands on a retail package.